Home > Latest News > Sumner v Colborne


Sumner v Colborne




Court of Appeal - 4th May 2018

A landowner does not owe a duty of care to ensure that vegetation contained on his land does not interfere with sight lines on the highway. The Court of Appeal so held in the above case, when upholding the decision of HHJ Pearce to strike out a claim brought by a motorist against two highway authorities, one of which owned the land in question. The motorist emerged from a minor road and collided with a cyclist on a trunk road, causing the cyclist very serious injuries. The cyclist sued the motorist. The motorist entered a defence alleging that he could not have avoided the accident because vegetation on land owned by a highway authority blocked his view. He brought contribution proceedings against the highway authority which owned the land (the Welsh Ministers) and the highway authority which maintained it pursuant to delegated arrangements (Denbighshire County Council). The motorist alleged that improvement works carried out on the land, combined with inadequate maintenance of vegetation, had worsened visibility for highway users. The Court of Appeal held that to impose a duty of care would have profound implications for anyone with fields or gardens bordering a road, create unwarranted and impractical problems, result in a new and unnecessary category of satellite litigation and run counter to the policy that motorists must take the highway network as they find it.

Andrew Warnock QC, instructed by Weightmans LLP, represented Denbighshire County Council.

 

Latest Stop Press Read more


Supreme Court: CN & GN v Poole Borough Council

16th July 2018

Today (16th July 2018) The Supreme Court will begin hearing the appeal in CN & GN v Poole Borough Council. This is scheduled for one and a half days.

The defendant is represented by Edward Faulks QC, Paul Stagg and Katie Ayres, instructed by Rob Hams of...

Read more

Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v S Williams & R Waistell

4th July 2018

The Court of Appeal has confirmed that damages are recoverable in nuisance for the encroachment of Japanese Knotweed on the neighbouring land.  Nicola Atkins acted as a junior counsel (led by Stephen Tromans QC) for the Second Respondent homeowner in an appeal brought by Network Rail.

You...

Read more