Home > Latest News > Re An application to Commit (H v D & ors) [2015] EWHC 2090 (Fam) and [2015] EWHC 2228 (costs)

Re An application to Commit (H v D & ors) [2015] EWHC 2090 (Fam) and [2015] EWHC 2228 (costs)

Application to commit struck out

Re An application to Commit (H v D & ors)  [2015] EWHC 2090 (Fam) and [2015] EWHC  2228 (costs)

Applications were made by a father against a CAFCASS officer, her supervisor and the mother’s solicitors to commit them to prison for contempt of court.

The father acted in person with the assistance of two McKenzie Friends.

Mrs Justice Roberts sitting in the Family Division on 7, 8 and 9 July 2015 heard an application by the Respondents to strike out the applications as an abuse of process and an application by the father for permission to bring parts of his committal application pursuant to FPR 2010 r 37.13(2).  

After the hearing the father sought permission to discontinue the application against the First Defendant. Permission was granted. The applications were struck out as an abuse of process. In so far as the applications sought committal for interference with the due administration of justice the Judge accepted that the applicant had to show more than a merely arguable case to pass the gateway for permission. She followed the analysis given by Moore-Bick LJ in KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton: Practice Note [2008] EWCA Civ 1280. The Judge determined that the applicant had not passed the threshold test or even come close.

Karen Shuman represented all three respondents. She was instructed by CAFCASS Legal and Nelsons Solicitors.

Latest Stop Press Read more

Experts in contempt - amend reports at your peril...

21st March 2019

Medical reports are often meticulously scrutinised in personal injury claims. They provide an overview of the claimant's personal account to his or her expert of their symptomatology, past medical history and the circumstances of their accident. Sometimes, a claimant may suggest that...

Read more

Channel 4 Television v Met Police Commissioner [2019] 1 WLUK 322

19th March 2019

A very sensible ruling by Edis J that the Crown Court has no jurisdiction to make any order for costs in relation to an application for a production order under the Terrorism Act 2000.

The case arose from the screening of a documentary by Channel 4 which showed a UK national, one Matthews,...

Read more